Data Protection Authority
Tech News

German Data Protection Authority Declares, Pay or Okay, Model Unlawful, Raises Concerns for News Pages

2 Mins read

Photo was created by Webthat using MidJourney

German Data Protection Authority Declares “Pay or Okay” Model Unlawful

The Data Protection Authority of Lower Saxony (LfD) has ruled that the popular German-language tech news site’s “Pay or Okay” approach, which required users to choose between paying for a monthly subscription or allowing their personal data to be processed for advertising and other purposes, is illegal. This decision follows a similar ruling by the Austrian Data Protection Authority earlier this year, raising concerns for other German news pages employing a similar model.

Lack of Specific Consent” Cited as Reason for Unlawfulness

The LfD determined that’s implementation of the “Pay or Okay” model in 2021 did not comply with the law as it failed to offer users the option to provide specific consent for each purpose. The decision aligns with guidelines issued by the Conference of German Data Protection Authorities (DSK). Although the LfD acknowledged that the model could be permissible in principle, the lack of specific and transparent consent on’s website violated the GDPR.

Data Protection Lawyer Criticizes Inadequate Consequences

Felix Mikolasch, a Data Protection Lawyer at noyb, expressed his support for the LfD’s decision. However, he highlighted that a mere reprimand is insufficient to deter others from adopting similar “Pay or Okay” models. Mikolasch criticized the prevalent “take it or leave it” system, where users are forced to consent to all types of processing or pay. He emphasized the need for explicit consent to each processing activity as required by the GDPR.

Website’s Pre-Consent Data Processing Uncovered

The LfD’s investigation revealed that processed users’ personal data as soon as the website was opened, even before any action was taken. This meant that tracking cookies were set before users had the chance to provide their consent. The revelation further strengthened the LfD’s case against the news outlet’s non-compliance with data protection regulations.

Issues of Transparency and Free Consent Highlighted

In addition to the “Pay or Okay” model, the LfD pointed out that engaged in unlawful and manipulative nudging techniques to influence users for its own benefit. The authority concluded that the consent obtained from users was not sufficiently informed, specific, or freely given. It also raised concerns about the difficulty of revoking consent at a later stage, suggesting a lack of legal grounds for data processing on the website.

Concerns Over Disproportionate Costs and Complex Subscription Process

Privacy advocacy group noyb raised concerns about the exorbitant costs for users to protect their privacy using the “Pay or Okay” model on The estimated cost was found to be 428 times higher than the earnings from data processing. Additionally, noyb highlighted the complexities involved in signing up for the paid subscription compared to the simpler process of “consenting” to being tracked. However, these concerns were not addressed in the LfD’s decision.


Related posts
Tech News

Amazon Monopoly Woes: A Battle for Fair Competition

3 Mins read
Tech News

Understanding the Vulnerability of Gen Z and Millennials to Online Scams

3 Mins read
Tech News

The iPhone 15 Set-Up Bug: Apple's Swift Fix with iOS 17.0.2

2 Mins read
Connect and Engage

Stay in the loop and engage with us through our newsletter. Get the latest updates, insights, and exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Tech News

Next-Generation Forest Monitoring: Revolutionizing Reforestation with High-Tech Solutions